Locative
media is a fairly new term in the domain of geographic information
systems that implies the use of portable, networked, location-aware
computing devices as social interfaces to place and location. The
alternative use of these technologies to explore location as a geographic
canvas detournes their conventional functionality and questions the
dominant models of geographic representation and their reductive
effects. For the Provflux 2005 festival,
I joined
forces with Sarah Lewison (www.carbonfarm.us) to propose an experimental
field expedition that explores the collaborative process of divine
cartography.
Divine cartography merges
the ancient art of divination or dowsing with global positioning
systems as a way to investigate the relationships in/between/beyond/around
the terrestrial landscape.
The process approaches datamining of both body and place through
esoteric and empirical methodologies and forces the user to reevaluate
the way one represents, relates to and moves about in their environment.
During the Provflux festival,
participants in the Locative Media workshop became field expeditioners.
As field expeditioners, participants were encouraged to conduct
research, compiling “data” and
collecting specimens and artifacts as they traversed the un/known
landscape. Each expeditioner made their own locative media devices
- divining rods - from old wire coat hangers and drinking straws.
Expeditioners then mobilized into two groups and relocated to an
undisclosed location simulating a feeling of being dislocated or
place-less. Using only camera phones and their divining rods, expeditioners
embarked on a journey to locate the other “missing” group.
Images of the surrounding environment taken with camera phones were
exchanged between groups throughout the expedition. The divining
rods served as a way to “excavate” the images received.
Using the divining rods, inquiries about the images with regards
to sight lines, cardinal points, latitudes and history were conducted.
As an experimental field expedition, the outcome was unknown. Would
the two groups ultimately converge? How would their data compare?
What new forms of learning and/or sensory fusions would be required
in order to utilize new technologies with the divining rod technology?
How had perception of a familiar landscape been altered and what
new information had emerged? Stay tuned. Answers to these questions
and other anecdotal data will be posted shortly on this web page.
Provflux 2005
http://www.pipsworks.com/contact/provflux.html
|